Tuesday, May 7, 2013

Final reflection


When I first started taking this class I was skeptical about how I was going to like it. I’ve never been much of a research writer. The only other real experience I had with this was writing my senior exit paper my junior year of high school and I did not do well on it. The writing aspect wasn’t the only alarming part of this class. I was also worried about the blog, in class peer editing, the daybook, and the several papers that seemed to pile up all at once.

 I have never cared for online writing because it feels awkward and I have a hard time keeping up with it. Inevitably, this ended up really hurting my grade for the first half of the semester. But, you have to do what you have to do and I ended up coming around to it. Once we no longer had to post every class day and only had to post important papers or reflections, it became less tedious and painful than previously. If I could have it my way, I would keep the blog strictly to papers and reflections. I think reflections throughout writing the paper could be a good idea as well so you can get vent or talk about concerns, frustrations or writing blocks you may be experiencing during the writing process.

The peer edits were a concern of mine as well. It is hard for me to sit down and look at someone else’s paper and give them constructive criticism. At times I felt like I was negative and may have put my classmates down, unintentionally. When I was looking at their papers I would try and not be nitpicky about grammar and punctuation errors and focused on the bigger ideas. However, focusing on the bigger ideas was hard for me because at times I didn’t fully understand what we were supposed to be doing or how to do it correctly. This was very apparent in the visual analysis. I had completely misunderstood the assignment on a couple levels, so anything I did say to my editing group, could have potentially misguided them or was no use at all. While not all of the advice I received was profound, the comments that my group gave me were positive and made me feel more comfortable with my writing.

Dun dun dunnnnn, the day book. At the beginning of the semester I was very open to the idea. I thought it was interesting that we would start the day by analyzing quotes and get the gears in our brain going. Here is a picture of the
first day writing in my daybook. Everything is neat and organized. However, as the semester went on, it was no longer important to me for those reasons. The bulk of my first drafts of all my papers are in this book. All the adderal fueled thoughts that rushed over me are scribbled down in those pages. The day book fueled the fire that was to become the many papers I would be submitting by the end of this class. By the end of the semester, my writting looks more hectic. I write, scratch out, and repeat.

Now the bulk of the class, the writing. In the first week of class when we looked at the list of potential topics, I knew mine right away. I knew I was going to focus on charter schools. When you look at my exploratory proposal essay, I state that I want to focus on whether charters were better or worse than public school. I had ideas about interviewing CMS teachers in both charter and traditional public schools. I wanted to know how they felt about their jobs, who felt more rewarded, and what the students thought. This was all good and well but as I began to write each paper, getting closer and closer to the final argumentative essay I felt my topic changing. It wasn’t which is better, it became is the choice of charter schools hurting the public education system.

The visual analysis was the hardest paper I had to write. I was confused on where to begin, how to connect it all and writing the analysis of each picture itself, still haunts my dreams. When I look at the first draft of my visual analysis to what it became at the final submission there isn’t any resemblance. The only thing that did manage to stay the same were in fact the images. Those alone took me hours to find, and personally they weren’t that strong and I wasn’t entirely pleased with them. The easiest piece of this essay was breaking down the image and picking everything apart. Analyzing it proved to be far more difficult. I start with a very basic breakdown of every single piece of the pictures but it grew to be an analysis of the image as a whole. Getting feedback from Megan along the way and the encouragement to keep pushing formed my paper into what it became. Like I’ve said earlier, this was my weakest essay but turned into one I was not only comfortable with but proud of.

 
The annotated bibliography was another painstaking essay for me. It was tedious and long, much longer than it needed to be. However this was the most helpful essay I wrote. This made my final argumentative essay a breeze that hardly caused me a lick of stress or anxiety. I think this should be something that is taught in high school and becomes a forced part of the writing process. It truly does make life a lot easier. Analyzing the paper was a little difficult for me. I found myself analyzing the concepts in the paper rather than the writing itself. It wasn’t until the last minute before the papers were due that I sat down in my daybook and re wrote every analysis for each source.
 

            The Toulmin and Rogerian essay were some of my favorite. The Rogerian flowed easily for me. Because I knew I was going to be writing my final argumentative essay in this style, I tried to perfect it and make it  foul proof. The brainstorming day for the Rogerian was a good day for me. Fueled with my trusty adderal, I went into class and basically had the entire the done by the time I left. The notecards were very helpful in guiding me to the final draft. The Toulmin was a bit more challenging. Perhaps I didn’t understand the concept fully or maybe it just wasn’t as strong. The grade between the two was substantial showing I was obviously stronger in one rather than the other.

            The argumentative paper, what should have been the most daunting was the easiest paper for me to write. My peer editing classmates agreed when they told me they thought it was the strongest paper I had written all semester. Sitting with my annotated bibliography, drafts of other essays and notes scribbled down in my day book I was able to crank thing paper out in about an hour and a half. A personal best time for myself. It was a relief to get this paper done. Not only was it going to be the last academic paper of the semester but it showed me that every step and every paper we did this semester was to help with this one. While all the other papers were at times excruciating, they all lead up to this final step and made it a breeze. This was a very eye opening experience because it taught me that future academic papers don’t have to feel like pulling teeth, all you need are the write components and to have done the proper research.  

            All in all, I am leaving this class optimistic about future writing assignments. These tasks will no longer be daunting and painful as the once were. I leave feeling prepared and knowledgeable about what it takes to be prepared to write a paper and how you should take an extra moment to fully analyze anything before submitting it.

Thursday, May 2, 2013

embed. i dont know if this is going to work

<p  style=" margin: 12px auto 6px auto; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; -x-system-font: none; display: block;">   <a title="View Argumentative Essay on Scribd" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/139105463/Argumentative-Essay"  style="text-decoration: underline;" >Argumentative Essay</a></p><iframe class="scribd_iframe_embed" src="http://www.scribd.com/embeds/139105463/content?start_page=1&view_mode=scroll" data-auto-height="false" data-aspect-ratio="undefined" scrolling="no" id="doc_92587" width="100%" height="600" frameborder="0"></iframe>

i dont know what i did, but i sent them to you via emial.

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

1st draft argumentative essay


Kendall O’Neill

Megan Keaton

Eng 112

22 April 2013

Charter Schools: Helping or Hurting the Public Education System

The Center for Research on Education Outcomes or CREDO proved that the vast majority of charter schools perform at the same level or worse than their traditional counter parts. While these schools continue to fail, they take important resources from the existing public school. The dwindling amount of resources like funding, qualified teachers and eager students cause public schools to teach in worse environments, making charters appear better. The children of today will be the adults of tomorrow and it is imperative that they have a strong education for a hopeful future. Charter schools and traditional public schools are playing a dangerous game of tug-of-war.  Charters continue to receive federal funding while traditional public schools funding has been drastically cut across the nation. In this paper, I will show the appeal of charter schools. I will then show how they are hurting the public education system. Finally, I will show the reader how this can be settled neutrally by keeping the successful charter programs around while filtrating out the weak ones.

Charter schools started about 20 years ago with the first one in Minnesota. They were created as an educational experiment. The teachers didn’t have to follow strict guidelines on what to teach, how to teach it, and how long to spend on a subject. Teachers had the freedom to teach as they saw best fit with the promise of producing high test scores. This freedom gave teachers the ability to try new innovative ways of teaching and teach by exploring through student’s creativity. The only restriction they had was that they had to produce strong results, high test scores, or the charter would end and the school would close. Charters are well liked because they rely on high amounts of community involvement with the community and parents of the students. Parents are consulted with opening, managing and upkeep of the school. Parents are asked to help with school fundraisers and most importantly in the involvement of their child’s every day school work. The downfall and reason all students can’t attend these desirable schools is because there aren’t enough of them. Students who attend these schools have been chosen randomly through a lottery. Most students won’t have the opportunity to attend them even if they have been on the wait list for years. 

“As of 2009, more than 4700 charter schools enrolled over 1.4 million children in 40 states and the District of Columbia. The ranks of charters grow by hundreds each year. Even so, more than 365,000 names linger on the charter school wait lists.” (CREDO) The desire to attend charter schools are higher than ever before. With NCLB Act 2001 parents and students had the opportunity to leave their failing schools or “drop out factories” and attend charter schools or use vouchers to attend better schools that weren’t in their district.  This choice made parents feel as if they were more in control over the education their child would receive.

There are a couple of charter programs that have proved to produce results much higher than those of their traditional schools counterparts. “Those are the ones that capture headlines or show up on 60 minutes: Harlem Academy, KIPP, Achievement First, Uncommon Schools, Aspire, MATCH, and Preuss schools.” (On the Commons) KIPP is a rigorous course that truly challenges kids and produces strong results. KIPP students have an extended school day and go from 7:30 – 5, they attend Saturday school, they attend mandatory summer school for three weeks and they receive two hours of homework a night. (KIPP) “Mathew Di Carlo at the Albert Shanker Institute estimates that the successful charter school year is 2-4 months longer than that of traditional public schools.”(On the Commons) With this extended school year, teachers have more time to focus on their students. They can spend more time on subjects the class may be struggling with and they have more time to focus on individual students. “In 2004, 85% of KIPP alumni who were seniors in high school were accepted to a university or college.” (KIPP)

The percentage of KIPP students that go off to college in comparison with students that attend the local neighborhood schools shows a vast difference. However most students that will enroll in the KIPP program will not finish it. It is estimated that about 60% of KIPP students will drop out during the course of middle school. (Washington Post) In reality KIPP students drop out more than they finish the program. Even with the number of kids dropping out, KIPP rarely allows students to enter in the 7th or 8th grade “…because in the later grades, KIPP students are surrounded only by successful peers who are the most committed to the program.” (Washington Post) KIPP may be able to produce higher test scores and higher percentages for students going off to college but they are false, misguided statistics.

 

studentenrollment.jpg

While some charters are efficient they most certainty aren’t all efficient. “…17 percent, provide superior education opportunities for their students. Nearly half of the charter schools nationwide have results that are no different from the local public school options and over a third, 37 percent, deliver learning results significantly worse that their students would have realized had they remained in traditional public schools” (CREDO) So, while most of these schools don’t educate better than those of their traditional counter parts, they continue to take important resources the public education system needs. They take large amounts of funding, some of the most dedicated teachers and students nationwide are on a waiting list hoping to gain entry this coming school year.

“While voting to cut $11 billion out of federal education funding for fiscal year 2011 (including cuts in Title 1, the Striving Readers program, literacy, teacher quality, math and science, and education technology, as well as special and vocational and adult education), the U.S House of Representation found the money to maintain charter and choice funding (Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011)(EBSCO Host).” The U.S government opted to cut an unbelievable amount out of public education funding but found money to continue the failing charter program. Writer David Morris for On the Commons magazine said it best when he describes the charter program to that of kudzu. An invasive plant that takes over the preexisting plants and smothers them. “The cycle feeds on itself. More charters mean less money for public school; the more public education deteriorates, the greater the popularity and number of charter schools.” (On the Commons) We are essentially hurting ourselves with charters rather than helping.

Teachers are also drawn to charter schools. They are un-unionized so teachers can receive higher pays with rising test scores. The teachers must do more work and teach longer days but they receive help from teacher aides. Teacher aids will sit with struggling students one on one or in small groups to give additional help. They will also help teacher with their lesson plans. (Bureau of Labor Statistics)

            So what can we do to help our public education system? Compromising with everyone is the easiest way to settle this long debated topic. We must get ride of the failing charter schools. They cause the most damage to our public education system and they make up 37 percent of all charter schools. We will keep the charter schools that performing the same as the traditional public schools. We can then talk with the U.S Department of Education, school boards, school districts and superintendents and come to a compromise about infiltrating our public schools and existing mediocre charter schools with the programs from our successful charters. This move will be radical and many people will be against it but it will be the best thing for the public education system. With the end of charters and return to traditional public schools, students around the country have the ability to attend these high performing schools without having to be waitlisted or go through the lottery. Also, with the end of charters all the misguided funding can return to traditional public schools. There will be more money for teacher quality, the focus on core subject like math and science and the ability to purchase new equipment and resources. This will be an expensive transformation, however, if higher test scores nationwide can be achieved, money should be no issue.

 

 

 

 

Work Cited:

Harvey, James. "Privatization: A Drain on Public Schools." EBSCO Host. EBSCO Host, Dec. 2011. Web. <http://ehis.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.cpcc.edu/ehost/detail?vid=3&sid=f2230e38-1c2d-4fb0-8244 4e41c3d66554%40sessionmgr198&hid=4&bdata=JnNjb3BlPXNpdGU%3d#db=a9h&AN=67664426>.

Raymond, Margaret, Dr. Multiple Choice: Charter School Performance in 16 States Executive Summary. Rep. N.p.: CREDO.stanford.edu, 2009. CREDO.stanford.edu. Web. 20 Mar. 2013. <http://credo.stanford.edu/reports/MULTIPLE_CHOICE_EXECUTIVE%20SUMMARY.pdf>.

Clark, Charles S. "Charter Schools Will They Imporove or Hurt Public Education." CQ Research. CQ Press, 20 Dec. 2002. Web. 23 Mar. 2013. <http://library.cqpress.com.ezproxy.cpcc.edu/cqresearcher/document.php?id=cqresrre2002122000&type=hitlist&num=0>.

Morris, David. "After 20 Years, Charter Schools Stray From Their Original Mission." After 20 Years, Charter Schools Stray From Their Original Mission. On the Commons Magazine, 7 Aug. 2012. Web. 28 Mar. 2013. <http://www.onthecommons.org/magazine/after-20-years-charter-schools-stray-their-original-mission>.

Smith, Hendrick. "Schools by School Reform KIPP." PBS. PBS, n.d. Web. 04 Apr. 2013. <http://www.pbs.org/makingschoolswork/sbs/kipp/>.

Strauss, Valerie. "The Answer Sheet -." The Answer Sheet -. The Washington Post, 1 Apr. 2011. Web. 23 Apr. 2013.

"Summary." U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 29 Mar. 2012. Web. 23 Apr. 2013.